Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Añadir filtros

Base de datos
Tópicos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año
1.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 201: 110731, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2327793

RESUMEN

AIM: This review aimed to estimate the level of acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine among persons with diabetes. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL to identify relevant studies for this review. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to generate an overall estimate of vaccine acceptance. The I2 statistic was used to quantify the degree of variation across studies, and subgroup analysis was conducted to identify the sources of heterogeneity. The review was conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). RESULTS: This review included 18 studies involving 11,292 diabetes patients. The pooled prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among persons with diabetes was 76.1% (95% CI: 66.7%-83.5%). The pooled prevalence across the continent ranged from 68.9% (95% CI: 47.8%-84.3%) in Asia to 82.1% (95% CI: 80.2%-83.8%) in Europe. Barriers to vaccine acceptance included misinformation, lack of information, mistrust, health concerns, and external influences. CONCLUSION: The barriers to vaccine acceptance identified in this review, could inform the formulation of health policies and public health interventions that are specifically tailored to address the needs of persons with diabetes.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Asia , Europa (Continente)
2.
Int Health ; 2023 Feb 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2238443

RESUMEN

Online interviews can be powerful tools in global health research. In this article, we review the literature on the use of and challenges associated with online interviews in health research in Africa and make recommendations for future online qualitative studies. The scoping review methodology was used. We searched on Medline and Embase in March 2022 for qualitative articles that used internet-based interviews as a data collection method. Following full-text reviews, we included nine articles. We found that online interviews were typically conducted via Microsoft Teams, Zoom, Skype, WhatsApp, Facebook Messaging and E-mail chats. Online interviews were used in Africa because of the restrictions imposed by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and the need to sample participants across multiple countries or communities. Recruitment for online interviews occurred online, interviews were characterised by inaudible sounds, the inability to use video options and the challenges of including people with low income and education. We recommend that researchers critically evaluate the feasibility of online interviews within a particular African locality before fully implementing this data collection approach. Researchers may also collaborate with community-based organisations to help recruit a more socioeconomically diverse sample because of the potential of excluding participants with limited internet access.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA